Final Report: Experiment 2 – Social Connection

We have finished our 2nd experiment already! In this experiment, the self proclaimed “Lone Wolf” Skeptic has tried a metamorphosis into the “Social Butterfly”. Here are the full details on how that went for him.

I discuss some research on social connection from Lee and Robbins (1998) not of the Baskin Robbins 31 flavors fame (at least not that we know).

I also discuss a review by James House and colleagues that found that social isolation has an impact on health comparable to the effect of high blood pressure, lack of exercise, obesity and smoking!! The feeling of loneliness or isolation has negative implications for stress hormones, immune function and cardiovascular function.

There is also animal work suggests that Oxycontin and opioids may serve as a protective factor, decreasing the stress-induced cortisol levels and exerting a calming effect on the nervous system

And lastly in the research arena, this study states that when faced with a life stressor, individuals high in social connection do not appraise the event as too stressful because they know they will receive support from others.

In the end, it appears that loneliness and isolation are more about your perception of loneliness and your genetic need for social connection. However if your need for social connections are met you may have some protective health juices flowing; and when not met, they can have impacts on the brain similar to physical pain.

And some quotes from some famous folks:

Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody—I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat.

Mother Theresa

Communities, which included the greatest number of the most sympathetic members, would flourish best, and rear the greatest number of offspring

Darwin

Lastly, here are the results from the Skeptic’s subjective surveys on social connection. The POMS (profile of mood states) combines all of the negative subcategories (fatigue, irritability, numbness, and tension) and subtracts the positive subcategory (vigor). We have also used surveys on general rating of physical, mental, and social health to track changes. Lastly, we have used the DALDA (daily analysis of life demands for athletes), to track how he is feeling over the treatments. And again, most of these surveys are used with athletes (my research specialty), but are applicable in this situation.

We still had positive trends in vigor (the good mood things) and generally negative trends for the negative mood things, besides fatigue and numbness which increased over this experimental period.
With the positive trends in the chart above, it is not surprising that the overall score has increased again!
Mostly unchanged, his quality of life scores and social activities and roles decreased slightly.
Pretty large decreases in his DALDA ratings, mostly due to some massive amounts of treat consumption with our son’s birthday and the Skeptics birthday thrown in here, affecting diet, weight, health scores. He also rated fatigue pretty poor.

So… do the survey results match his verbal proclamations? Listen to find out if he remains the “Lone Wolf” or if he has transformed into the “Social Butterfly”.

RSS
Follow by Email
Facebook
Instagram